‘ERTMS deployment is stuck in a vicious circle’

source: ProMedia Group

The on-board roll out of ETCS is behind schedule because there is little incentive for operators to invest in the system when they can still run on class-B systems, says Marcin Wojcik, Policy Officer at the European Commission at RailTech Europe. This results in a vicious circle putting a brake on both on-board and trackside installations. 

Want to read more?

Subscribe now!

Take advantage of our exclusive offer to get full access to all premium content.

See the offer

Author: Esther Geerts

Former Editor RailTech.com

1 comment op “‘ERTMS deployment is stuck in a vicious circle’”

Gertjan Rhebergen|23.06.22|10:27

ERTMS should create benefits for railway undertakings. It does not because high cost of equipment and integration. Strange because: equipment could be standardized and volumes of modules could be high. As a result development cost could be shared over a large volume. It isn’t: a) UNISIG specified the air-gap interface only which keeps monopolism alive, b) obsolete technolgy, c) few not expensive STM exist. Result: very high cost of ownership.

Add your comment

characters remaining.

Log in through one of the following social media partners to comment.

‘ERTMS deployment is stuck in a vicious circle’ | RailTech.com

‘ERTMS deployment is stuck in a vicious circle’

source: ProMedia Group

The on-board roll out of ETCS is behind schedule because there is little incentive for operators to invest in the system when they can still run on class-B systems, says Marcin Wojcik, Policy Officer at the European Commission at RailTech Europe. This results in a vicious circle putting a brake on both on-board and trackside installations. 

Want to read more?

Subscribe now!

Take advantage of our exclusive offer to get full access to all premium content.

See the offer

Author: Esther Geerts

Former Editor RailTech.com

1 comment op “‘ERTMS deployment is stuck in a vicious circle’”

Gertjan Rhebergen|23.06.22|10:27

ERTMS should create benefits for railway undertakings. It does not because high cost of equipment and integration. Strange because: equipment could be standardized and volumes of modules could be high. As a result development cost could be shared over a large volume. It isn’t: a) UNISIG specified the air-gap interface only which keeps monopolism alive, b) obsolete technolgy, c) few not expensive STM exist. Result: very high cost of ownership.

Add your comment

characters remaining.

Log in through one of the following social media partners to comment.