Dutch cargo hyperloop would result in net reduction of CO2 emissions

source: Hardt Hyperloop

A hyperloop network for freight between North and South Holland can lead to economic benefits and a significant CO2 reduction. That is one of the main conclusions from a study by Dutch company Hardt Hyperloop.

Want to read more?

Subscribe now!

Take advantage of our exclusive offer to get full access to all premium content.

See the offer

Author: Hendriëlle de Groot

Hendriëlle de Groot is an Editor of SpoorPro, a sister publication of RailTech

1 comment op “Dutch cargo hyperloop would result in net reduction of CO2 emissions”

Joachim Falkenhagen|13.11.21|12:31

Saving “0.6 million tonnes CO2 after 30 years of operations” multiplied by damage costs of e.g. 500 Euro/ton would lead to climate benefit of 300 mio. Euro. And much less, if a quicker conversion of the road alternative to non-fossil fuel was assumed.

Conclusion: The benefit is not really relevant compared to the estimated investment costs of 1.5 billion Euro.

Add your comment

characters remaining.

Log in through one of the following social media partners to comment.

Dutch cargo hyperloop would result in net reduction of CO2 emissions | RailTech.com

Dutch cargo hyperloop would result in net reduction of CO2 emissions

source: Hardt Hyperloop

A hyperloop network for freight between North and South Holland can lead to economic benefits and a significant CO2 reduction. That is one of the main conclusions from a study by Dutch company Hardt Hyperloop.

Want to read more?

Subscribe now!

Take advantage of our exclusive offer to get full access to all premium content.

See the offer

Author: Hendriëlle de Groot

Hendriëlle de Groot is an Editor of SpoorPro, a sister publication of RailTech

1 comment op “Dutch cargo hyperloop would result in net reduction of CO2 emissions”

Joachim Falkenhagen|13.11.21|12:31

Saving “0.6 million tonnes CO2 after 30 years of operations” multiplied by damage costs of e.g. 500 Euro/ton would lead to climate benefit of 300 mio. Euro. And much less, if a quicker conversion of the road alternative to non-fossil fuel was assumed.

Conclusion: The benefit is not really relevant compared to the estimated investment costs of 1.5 billion Euro.

Add your comment

characters remaining.

Log in through one of the following social media partners to comment.